
Maybe I'm wishfully embellishing my fond childhood memories of watching the 1984 Winter Olympics in Sarajevo, Yugoslavia, but I do seem to recall watching a whole lot of Bobsled, Luge, and Skiing events that February... and not just the finals, or 2 minute clips of team USA's runs.
Pretty much every Winter Olympics since has been a disappointment - coverage of ice skating at the expense of the other events has slowly increased, as have the Hallmark-flavored 15 minute mini-bio-documentaries about American athletes. I heard last night that NBC will be showing ice skating coverage on 10 of the 16 days they're broadcasting the games; that's 62.5%. I'm not sure about the actual hourly percentage of coverage that will amount to, but it seems grossly disproportionate given all the different sports that countries are competing in. I also saw some statistics taken from a survey of what sports men and women were planning to watch; predictably, women were planning to watch figure skating and men were planning to watch downhill skiing. Figure skating won out over all.
As for non-ice skating events and medal ceremonies, you had better hope that somebody from Team USA made a good showing, because otherwise it's apparently not worth watching.
Winter and Summer Olympic coverage in this country is also obsessed with US medal count, recapping every 15 minutes how many medals we've won. It's nice when an American athlete wins a medal, but I thought the whole point of the Olympic games as revived around the turn of the 20th century was to celebrate the athletic prowess of all countries; a respectful competetion among the best and brightest of all the nations. It doesn't seem right to begrudge another country their medal, but that's pretty much just what our own obsessive medal-counting does.
I really dislike being shown only the highlight performances or finals of a given event, too, and yet because so damn much time is devoted to ice skating, that's all they can squeeze in for Skiing, Bobsledding, etc. I was really looking forward to the reintroduction of Skeleton this year, but when I looked up the broadcast schedule I noticed that we only get to see one segment of Skeleton, finals only. That'll probably be 1/2 an hour, a whole hour tops.
I will admit to a predilection for the "boy sports"... the ones where people go down mountains or iced chutes at unbelievable speeds, competing to beat each others' times by hundredths of a second. Why? Because they're exciting, and not subject to interperetation by a panel of judges.
I don't know what the demographic of the average viewer is, but it almost seems like NBC has entered a vicious cycle; by catering to skating fans (predominantly women, according to the survey) with ever more ice skating coverage, of course they're going to get increasing numbers of people watching skating events because that's all they ever show any more. I would love to get Olympic coverage from another country... I expect it would be much more varied and much less provincial.
This is where a Tivo would come in mighty handy.
I swung by the Coffee Roaster on my way to work this morning for one of their amazing Americanos, and while I was waiting for my coffee I watched in amazement as the man in front of me poured at least three tablespoons of sugar into his coffee... He just kept pouring and pouring out of the sugar dispenser, giving it a quick shake now and again as a clump blocked the opening.
It seemed to go on forever... watching all that sugar go into the coffee made my tastebuds hurt. I don't have anything against a person sweetening their coffee; I do it myself sometimes, but this was extreme... I get a little bit queasy when I try to imagine what that coffee must have tasted like when that guy was done with it.
I never use more than a packet of sugar, maybe two when I'm sweetening coffee or tea... any more than that for me and the texture of the drink changes, getting noticably thicker and somehow leaving an instant film in my mouth and throat. I don't know why this only bothers me in a hot drink; I know soda has an ungodly amount of sugar per can, but I drink it all the time.
I need to do something about my terrible timing when it comes to visiting classic spots around Los Angeles.
Just this last weekend I was thinking about driving down to Hawthorne and Downey early one morning to take some photos of Chip's Coffee Shop, the oldest McDonald's in the country, and Johnie's Broiler Coffee Shop. I think I elected to sleep in instead, reasoning that I would be able to go next weekend, or whenever.
I bought an L.A. Times to read at lunch today, and to my horror read that Johnie's Broiler has ceased to operate as a coffee shop; apparently the new owner of the property is making a half-assed attempt at turning the establishment into a used car lot. This happened some time last month, well before I added the place to my list of buildings to photograph, but that's not much consolation.
Fortunately, there seem to be a good many people upset about this, and the article said there have been multiple pleas to the L.A. Conservancy's Modern Committee to help save the establishment from either being torn down, or allowed to crumble and fade at the corner of a shabby used car lot.
This is probably the shove I need to do something more proactive than taking photos and join the conservancy myself, and get involved with Modcom... the idea has already been kicking around my head these last few weeks, but I haven't given it too much thought because of my burnout as a docent at the Ennis-Brown and Hollyhock houses a couple of years ago. I think working with the conservancy would be more fulfilling in the long run, though, and I guess it's time to look into it.
So this weekend I'll certainly be heading down to Downey to get some photos of Johnie's before it gets festooned with any more crappy plastic banner signs. (The photo accompanying the article shows a "USED CARS" banner string unceremoniously across the edge of the roof under the lively "Johnie's" neon script.)
And from now on I have to try to get myself in the habit of just going to these places as soon as I learn about them. I should have gone back to the Sundown with a real camera when I had the chance, and it was torn down by the time I got around to it... ditto with the "Monty's Steak House" sign that had stood over a vacant lot in Encino for the 5 years we've lived in the Valley. Early last month I had an errand over that way and finally had the presence aforethought to bring the camera with me. The sign, which I had driven by not two weeks earlier on Christmas Eve, had disappeared under a new parking lot. Ditto "Schaeber's Cafeteria", formerly at Victory blvd near Laurel Canyon... Schaeber's closed before I ever got around to eating lunch there, and some months later reopened as the "Mirage Cafe". The classic sign from the 40's or 50's disappeared an in its place is a stark white sign with ugly, straight text that looks terrible in its oval frame. Ditto the bowling alley/coffee shop way out by San Fernando on the San Fernando road... the first time I drove by the place in 1997 it was closed and boarded up, but its amazing "Coffee Shop" sign was still there and hadn't even been destroyed by vandals. When I finally went back with a camera in 1999 the bowling alley had been reopened, but not before being stripped of all of its original character and painted white. The sign is gone, probably in a landfill somewhere.
Damn, now I have half a mind to head down to Downey tonight. I probably would if I had any confidence that Johnie's neon signage would be on after dark.
When I read about this article on Plastic.com, I got pretty sad. Starting next Monday, Sesame Street is switching to a new format geared towards 2 year olds. (For its first 32 seasons, the target audience was 3-5 year olds.)
Additionally, the show's 1 hour running time is being broken down into MTV-sized bites so that baby never gets a chance to develop anything like an attention span; the format we Gen-Xers remember is that each hour long episode would have a story woven among all the great old animations and educational shorts. So yes, even back then they were feeding us short little clips of stuff, but it was always bound together by that outer story line; you kept watching because you wanted to find out what happened next.
Now that story has been collapsed to 10 minutes, followed by 10 solid minutes of Elmo (I have a headache already), and some other 10 minute chunks.
Why the shift in targeted audience? Apparently 3-5 year olds these days are already too jaded to watch Sesame Street, what with being raised by the pseudo-mommies at the day care center as soon as their real mother is ready to go back to work.
I watched a lot of Sesame Street growing up, both as a 3-5 year old and as a 9-11 year old (what with my sister being 6 years younger & all.) I think the first sign that all was not well on Sesame Street was the introduction of Telly the neurotic monster. It's fine to use a neurotic character in a skit to demonstrate that things are almost never as big a deal as they seem, but what does it teach a kid when the neurotic character never grows out of the behavior?
The real beginning of the end was the introduction of Elmo, who as far as I can tell was the role model for all the hyperactive, poorly behaved children that run around our apartment building's courtyard screaming at the tops of their lungs. I still don't understand what purpose he's supposed to serve if it's not teaching kids to be spastic.
Sometime in the mid-late 80's they stopped showing most of the best animated shorts. Granted, many of them were heavy on the 70's psychedelic-disco style, but they were good.
Probably the biggest factor in the decline in the show's quality was the untimely death of Jim Henson. But this, this is the last nail in the coffin as far as I'm concerned. I hope that Noggin will continue to run "Sesame Street... Unpaved" so I can get my "12345 6789-10 11 12!" fix when I need it.
The other thing that bothers me about this is that I realize I sound like a baby boomer lamenting the demise of Howdy Doody (nothing wrong with that, of course; it's just hard for people from subsequent generations to relate), and that as I get older it's only going to get worse. And I'm only 27. If I'm not careful, I'll be a full-fledged curmudgeon by the time I'm 35.
Last Wednesday night I buckled under and ordered Night of the Tiki from Amazon.
Being the sneaky bastards that they are, they recommended another book right before I was ready to check out: Paper Engineering for Pop-up Books and Cards. That one made its way into my shopping cart as well.
I was pleasantly surprised to learn that my books had already shipped by Thursday afternoon, and I've been checking that magic tracking number several times daily ever since. My books arrived in Van Nuys last Friday, and this morning at 11:00 AM the status was updated to OUT FOR DELIVERY, which I took to mean that the box had been thrown on a truck that would be stopping by my neighborhood today.
Thus, much of my day (and evening) was spent in eager anticipation; I've been wanting Night of the Tiki since last September, and I'm excited about the paper engineering book because as it turns out, I've had a few ideas for some origamic architecture that I just can't figure out how to do in the one-piece, 90 degree format I'm familiar with.
But, no package today. The suspense would be significantly reduced if I didn't know that my books are sitting in a UPS facility within a few miles of here; knowing that they're on their way and most likely getting here sometime this week would be enough.
Oh, those brown shorts-wearing bastards! I just checked the tracking number again, and at 9:00 PM it was updated to read VAN NUYS - TOLUCA CA US PACKAGE MISSED, NO DELIVERY ATTEMPT MADE.
Now, I know I'm not having a dishwasher shipped to me or anything, but my Amazon package can hardly be small enough to have been missed if it was rattling around the back of an empty UPS truck. I wish Amazon would work something out with stores like Borders where I could order online(with Amazon's discount) and pick the book up my own damn self.
They had better not show up when my wife is out buying food for the snakes tomorrow.
I remember now why I never seemed to have any free time when I used to go to work so late in the morning at Stan Lee Media... usually anywhere between 9:00 and 10:00 AM.
Even on days when I was only there for 8 hours, it meant getting leaving work at 5:30-6:30... and despite my short commute my evening was effectively killed. I realize that for many people, working until 5:30 or 6:30 followed by a one or even two hour commute is the norm here in SoCal, and I can't imagine how they do it.
Since starting my current job I'm usually at work by 8:00 or 8:30 at the latest. Getting out at 4:30 is great, and 5:00 isn't too bad; by the time I get home, make and/or eat dinner, and/or walk the dog I usually still feel up to working on the blog or whatever.
This last week I don't think I got to work much before 9:00 at all... and on a couple of mornings it was closer to 10:00! By the time I got home I wasn't good for much of anything... which is why there hasn't been anything new blog-wise since :::gasp::: last Tuesday night. I started a post on Friday, but the browser crashed and I didn't get around to redoing it.
I know lack of inspiration has been a factor, too... fortunately, I've got a couple of books on the way from Amazon that should give me a nice jumpstart. More on those when they arrive. :)